Romans 15 Shows That Isaiah 11 Is Fulfilled

by Adam Maarschalk

The wolf is now dwelling with the lamb, and this has been true for two millennium. Is this a surprising statement? While this is not true in the animal kingdom, it is most certainly true in Christ, for His Church. I’m referring, of course, to two well-known parallel passages in Isaiah 11 and Isaiah 65:

[Isaiah 11:1-10] There shall come forth a shoot from the stump of Jesse, and a branch from his roots shall bear fruit… The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall graze; their young shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. The nursing child shall play over the hole of the cobra, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder’s den. They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea. In that day the root of Jesse, who shall stand as a signal for the peoples—of him shall the nations inquire, and his resting place shall be glorious.

[Isaiah 65:25] “The wolf and the lamb shall graze together; the lion shall eat straw like the ox, and dust shall be the serpent’s food. They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain,” says the LORD.

PHOTO SOURCE: TERRY CROPPER

On what authority do I say that this is a present reality? The authority I stand on is the New Testament, which interprets the Old Testament far better than I ever could. Specifically, I would point to the testimony of the apostle Paul in Romans 15. The short study that follows already exists on this blog, but it’s buried in a longer post regarding Revelation 20 and the millennium. It’s a valuable study, so I’d like to re-post it here on its own. Terry Cropper has also posted this study on his “New Jerusalem Community” site (at this link). As Terry says, “Seven centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ, the prophet Isaiah peered into the future and depicted the glorious nature of the Messianic era with these words.” Here’s the study as it appears on Terry’s site:

In what sense is the wolf now dwelling with the lamb (Isaiah 11:6), the cow and the bear grazing together (verse 7), the nursing child playing over the hole of the cobra (verse 8), and the earth full of the knowledge of the Lord (verse 9)? Good question—let’s ask the apostle Paul. He quoted the next verse as being fulfilled in his own lifetime: “IN THAT DAY the root of Jesse, who shall stand as a signal for the peoples—of Him shall the nations inquire, and His resting place shall be glorious” (Isaiah 11:10). Romans 15:12, where Paul cites this verse, reads this way: “The root of Jesse will come, even He who arises to rule the Gentiles, in Him will the Gentiles hope” (Romans 15:12).

The context of both Isaiah 11 and Romans 15 suggests a bringing together in Christ the remnant of God’s people from among both the Jews and the Gentiles. Isaiah uses figurative language; Paul in Romans is more straightforward. Why not? The “mystery of God” spoken of by the prophets had been revealed and was about to be fulfilled in Paul’s day (compare Ephesians 3:6 with Revelation 10:7).

This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (Eph. 3:6). There is no Jew or Gentile in Christ Jesus (Romans 10:12-13; Galatians 3:28, 5:6, 6:15-16); “the dividing wall of hostility” has been broken down (Eph. 2:14).

The wolf (Gentiles), so to speak, now dwells safely with the lamb (Jews), i.e. among those who belong to Christ. The Gentile nations which were deceived and dwelling “far off” (Ephesians 2:11-22; Romans 9:22-26) prior to Christ’s work on the cross are now brought near (so that without distinction “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved”; Romans 10:12-13).

To expand a little bit on this, Paul states in Romans 15:8 his purpose for quoting Isaiah 11:10 four verses later in Romans 15:12.

For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed and, moreover, that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy.

Clearly, then, Isaiah’s prophecy was confirmed (fulfilled) when Jesus came to earth to be a servant even to the point of going to the cross on our behalf. This also brought about a great harvest among the Gentiles. Isaiah 11 goes on to immediately say this:

In that day the Lord will extend his hand yet a second time to recover the remnant that remains of his people, from Assyria, from Egypt, from Pathros, from Cush, from Elam, from Shinar, fromHamath, and from the coastlands of the sea.

Did this not occur on Pentecost, when Jews from “every nation under heaven” were gathered to hear the gospel preached through the mouth of Peter?

Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard their own language being spoken. Utterly amazed, they asked: “Aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans? Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language? Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs—we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!” (Acts 2:5-11)

Paul’s application of classic “premillennial passages” (Isaiah 11 and Isaiah 65) to his own lifetime (Romans 15) is not an isolated incident in the New Testament. Many of these passages have been arbitrarily equated with the millennium (spoken of solely in Revelation 20), thrust into our future and declared to be unfulfilled, when the New Testament says otherwise. Simply put, a lot of Old Testament passages taken by premillennialists to refer to a future, physical/earthly kingdom centered around earthly Jerusalem actually have to do with a present, non-physical/earthly kingdom centered around the New Jerusalem, the Church (Gal. 4:24-27, Heb. 12:22-24).

Let us rejoice that God’s kingdom, marked by “righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit” (Romans 14:17), is here with us now.

7 Comments to “Romans 15 Shows That Isaiah 11 Is Fulfilled”

  1. I agree with Adam Maarschalk concerning the fulfilliment of this prophecy. However, I also understand that this prophecy will be recognized or realized in expressions beyond just spiritual in that new heaven and earth (hereafter). The Bible is laced—from the very first chapter of Genesis, through Revelation—with types and shadows, parallel prophecies, mirrored events, and already/not yet factors of prophecies. This is a recognized part of Hebrew and Christian theology. I can write a whole book on this and list the various prophecies and promises of God that we can experience here on earth in a limited way, but we will see it fulfilled in the hereafter in its most expressed and complete way.

    Therefore, I believe that this prophecy in discussion will be recognized in heaven in a very literal sense. Having said that, I do not believe in “a future, physical/earthly kingdom centered around earthly Jerusalem.” I do not see literal Jerusalem or literal Israel as players in any fulfillments of eschatological events to come. I do believe in a “new” (not restored) heaven and earth, after the elements of this world and universe is destroyed.

    Nevertheless, I do believe the Church needs to wake up and understand Adam Maarschalk’s comments and how they can be applied to today’s believers.

    • Dr. Burks,

      Thank you for your good thoughts on this post. It’s clear that we agree on a number of important points when it comes to eschatology and the subject of modern-day Israel. As we both know, however, we don’t quite view “the new heavens and earth” in the same way.

      I’m curious which passages of Scripture you believe state or imply that “the new heavens and earth” is to be physically created following the destruction of the universe. Very much related to this subject, I just posted a study on Matthew 24:35, which also touches on what Jesus said in Matthew 5:17-18, what Peter said in II Peter 3, and what Isaiah said in Isaiah 65:

      http://kloposmasm.com/2012/02/13/matthew-2435-51-part-1-of-2/

      That post sheds a lot of light on what I’ve come to believe on this particular subject.

      Blessings,
      Adam

      • Adam,
        I have read the discourse from Matthew that you listed and brought to my attention. Many, if not most, partial-preterists believe that the warnings about AD 70 go up to verse 35. Thereafter, it is understood that Jesus spoke briefly reasurring His disciples that He will return physically for His Church someday. But because they will not be around, He did not spend much time on the issue, except to confirm that there will be an end of the world.
        Even Kenneth Gentry, as strong-partial preterist believes the AD 70 subject ends at verse 35. Most others I have studied agree with this, except the hyper-preterists or full preterists. It is here, where we may disagree. If we do disagree with this, then we have a brother’s disagreement and cannot argue it any further.
        Having said that, the reason I believe that this world and the cosmos will come to a physical ending, to make way for a new heaven and new earth, is because of Peter’s statement (2 Peter 3:10-12) that the earth’s “elements will melt with fervent heat.” This strongly implies that everything will be annihilated or destroyed by fire, heat, or some other method that would bring it to melt. But then again, you may believe that Peter’s statement referred to the 1st century event in AD 70 as well, which shuts down our discussion.
        Theologically, the Lord does replace physical matter in some of His plans by destroying the old. For instance, I had a recent discussion with another individual that is a partial preterist, but not in a extreme way. In fact, he is probably less than I am in his preterism. But he is having a problem understanding that his world and cosmos will be totally destroyed to make room for a new heaven and new earth. He leans towards a transformation in the last day when the Lord returns, in that the Lord will miraculously use the elements that exist to change it to a “new heaven and new earth.” But my question is, is that our glorified bodies, which we will receive in the hereafter, will be a totally new body. It will not be a transformation, as it is spiritually speaking in today’s world when we become Christians. If so, what do we do with the many believers throughout history that have had their bodies burned to death and completely destroyed. Many bodies that were not embalmed turned to dust and no longer exist. But God will provide a new glorified body for each of them. He can do the same with this earth and the cosmos as we know them.
        I have not been given any evidence or facts to this date that would change my mind on this. it is not issue that I am not willing to change on, but I need a good reason. And I have not come across that reason yet. I hope this makes sense.

        God bless,
        Chuck

    • Hi Dr. Burks,

      I don’t necessarily believe that having different understandings of these things means that conversations have to be shut down. If we do disagree in the end, though, then, as you said, it will be as brothers.

      Yes, I’ve read Kenneth Gentry’s viewpoint that Matthew 24 is fulfilled up through verse 34 (or 35), and that the rest of the chapter remains unfulfilled. As I explained in my study of Matthew 24:35 (cited above), one reason I don’t believe this to be true is because of what I see in Luke 17:22-37. In that text, four portions are directly parallel to content found within Matthew 24:1-34, and two other portions are directly parallel to content found within Matthew 24:35-51.

      So in Luke 17:22-37, Jesus blends these six references (four of which are present in Matthew 24:1-34, and two of which are present in Matthew 24:35-51) together, without any distinctions related to time. Therefore, I feel that I would not be consistent if I acknowledge that everything Jesus said in Matthew 24:1-34 is tied to His own first century generation, but insist that what He said in Matthew 24:35 and beyond is not yet fulfilled. Otherwise, in Luke 17:22-37, Jesus arbitrarily switched back and forth between speaking of first century events and events in the 21st century (or beyond).

      In that same study, I observed that Galatians 4:9 and Colossians 2:20 make use of the same word translated as “elements” in II Peter 3:10. It’s clear that Paul spoke in these two texts, not of the cosmos, but of what was contained in the Law:

      [1] “But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles of the world, whose slaves you want to be once more? You observe days and months and seasons and years!” (Galatians 4:9-10).

      [2] “If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations—‘Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch’ (referring to things that all perish as they are used)—according to human precepts and teachings?” (Colossians 2:20-22).

      In addition, I understand a number of Scriptures to indicate that this physical earth will never end:

      [1] “Neither will I smite anymore every living thing, as I have done” (Genesis 8:21).
      [2] “And He built His sanctuary like high palaces, like the earth which He has established forever” (Psalm 78:69).
      [3] “The world is also established that it cannot be moved” (Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10).
      [4] “…who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed forever” (Psalm 104:5).
      [5] “One generation passes away, and another generation comes, but the earth abides forever” (Ecclesiastes 1:4).

      I do agree with you that our present earthly bodies will have nothing to do with the way that we will appear on the other side of the grave. I believe that I hinted at a different understanding in an earlier conversation on another thread, but I’ve thought this question through more thoroughly and do see it the same way that you do.

      • Adam, I don’t think I meant to say that when two can’t agree they should “shut it down” or stop talking. What I am trying to say is that if we are discussing a block wall and I adamantly claim it is white, while you declare it is black, and we can’t convince each other any differently after debating it, we need to move on to other things and accept a brother’s disagreement. I can listen to your arguments and still declare that it is white. We find ourselves at a dead end road.
        You seem to be very firm in your hyper-preterist belief, and I don’t think at this point I can change that about you. However, I am sure we have a lot we can agree on about the Lord.
        As for me, I am a partial-preterist, as I cannot deny that Matthew 24 (up to verse 35) is about AD 70. I even believe that Revelation was written pre-70 and that the first 3 chapters speak to churches that existed at that time. I just cannot accept the full preterist idea, as it would change the whole core of theology as most mainline Christians believe today. It would take away the hope of all Christian believers today and make the Bible just a document of the past, with nothing for Christians of the ages beyond AD70. I just can’t step across that threshold of belief. Kenneth Gentry and others that believe even stronger than I in preterism, will agree with me on this.
        In addition, it is my firm belief that we can make certain things in the Scripture fit anything we want to. We can spin the Scriptures and prophecies. Sometimes it is not on purpose, but just be perception. Having said that, I have enough reservation and respect for the preterist belief (it holds a strong argument) that I have listed in a parallel fashion, the preterist view, in my commentary of Revelation, Matthew 24, and eschatology in general.

  2. Dear Dr. Burks,

    I also know that there is much we can agree on about the Lord, and that’s the beauty of it. Despite being in the minority with my belief in fulfilled eschatology, I still enjoy rich fellowship with many futurists, even Christian Zionist-leaning dispensationalists. We’re brothers and sisters, and part of God’s family through His grace.

    It did take me a while before I was willing to leave the mainstream view(s) of eschatology, and to be willing to part ways with certain statements in the creeds. I do understand your dilemma. If “sola scriptura” is the path that God wants us to be on, though, and I believe it is, then I have to go with what I believe Scripture teaches, even if it’s in opposition to something in the creeds.

    I do very much disagree that full preterism “take[s] away the hope of all Christian believers today and make[s] the Bible just a document of the past, with nothing for Christians of the ages beyond AD70.” If there’s a form of “hyper-preterism” out there that teaches anything like that, then I want nothing to do with it. We live in God’s kingdom, which is everlasting and ever-expanding. We have the same call today as God’s people did in 30-70 AD to walk in obedience to the teachings of Christ, to bear one another’s burdens, to love/prefer/bless one another, to proclaim the good news of the gospel to the lost around us, etc. We have access to the tree of life, with its leaves being for the healing of the nations. (Contrast that with John Hagee’s warmongering, for example.) All who are in Christ, but haven’t yet experienced physical death, we still have the hope of receiving our spiritual bodies at the time of our personal resurrection on the other side of the grave. I have hope that the gospel will be more deeply impacting Asia, Africa, South America, North America, and the rest of the world by the time I leave this earth than is now the case here in early 2012.

    Mike Blume is a partial-preterist, but I really value an article that he wrote titled, “If Most of the Book of Revelation Is Fulfilled…What’s the Point of It Today?” Here’s the link to his article:

    http://mikeblume.com/imply.htm

    • Hi Adam,
      Thanks for the recent reply to my comments. I have a couple of matters that possibly you can answer for my own understanding. Do full preterists believe that the world and humankind will continue throughout eternity? Does it just continue on and on, or is there and end, when God says time is up?

      Many Christian scientists (astologers and such) have believed they have produced new evidence that the universe and cosmos did have a beginning (as according to Scripture) and that it is expanding again and deteriorating, as if it were set up fo an end. They are saying that the study of the cosmos with our new instruments to observe the edges of space has show that the universe is cooling and expanding and was designed to fail. If this is so, it would support those of us who believe the world has and designed ending.

      Is there somewhere where I can view or look at a summary or outline of what the full preterists believe with scriptural evidence (or historical record) or proof (such as the following example):
      -The Old Covenant (temporary)
      -Rejection by Israel and the Jewish Nation; the Jews demanded the crucifixion of Christ, carried out by the Romans
      -The heart of the religious center of the Old Covenant and Judiasm, Jerusalem, is judged and made desolate, carried out by the Romans
      -Jews are killed, scattered, taken into slavery; Christians escape and left desolate by Rome for a short time.
      -The New Covenant is now in place (eterna); Roman emporers of 1st century turn against Christianity

      In my recent commentary, which contains a parallel look at preterism and my own conclusions, based on what I believe is sound exegesis and hermeneutic principles, I want to list a simple outline in a nutshell as to what the full preterists believe. I know you can’t provide scripture for everything I listed above, but I will also accept comments by historians, such as Josephus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers